Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|
Azorius Control , Azorius Synthesizer , Boros Forge , Dimir Reanimator , Domain Zur Overlords , Izzet Repurpose , Jeskai Control , Mono White Tokens , Orzhov Demons , Orzhov Tokens
Realmbreaker, the Invasion Tree ranks #216 out of approximately 413 cards in raw efficiency (top 52%).
Colorless average: 64.1%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Realmbreaker, the Invasion Tree is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 33.33 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.0%. Realmbreaker, the Invasion Tree has a win rate of 100.0%, making it 35.1% better than other 3-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sunfall | Sorcery | 6 | 46.2% | 0 |
Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 6 | 39.1% | 0 |
Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 8 | 29.4% | 0 |
The Stone Brain | Legendary Artifact | 5 | 27.0% | 0 |
Get Lost | Instant | 8 | 23.5% | 0 |
Authority of the Consuls | Enchantment | 7 | 22.4% | 0 |
Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 5 | 20.0% | 0 |
Cards that perform better with Realmbreaker, the Invasion Tree than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Mono White Tokens | 68 | 11.2% | 57.3% |
Azorius Control | 10 | 2.6% | 37.7% |
Domain Zur Overlords | 7 | 0.5% | 19.1% |
Selesnya Beanstalk | 3 | 4.5% | 50.0% |
Azorius Synthesizer | 2 | 10.5% | 21.4% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.